A confrontation between a Target employee and a Spanish-speaking delivery driver has ignited a firestorm online, with critics accusing the worker of false imprisonment after she refused to let the man leave a Los Angeles-area store. The surreal altercation, originally posted to TikTok by user @xxrenzoxx21 and shared to Redditโs r/PublicFreakout, is now being described by many as a case of corporate overreach turned personal power trip.
The video shows the delivery driver (who appears to be an independent contractor) pleading repeatedly in Spanish to be allowed out of a locked exit door after completing a drop-off. But the Target employee refuses, demanding he first provide his company information so she can โfile a complaint.โ
She then radios in a call for assistance, referring to the man as an โuncompliant vendor,โ a term typically reserved for situations requiring corporate escalation, not for barring someone from leaving a building.
Despite the delivery driver speaking only Spanish, the Target employee engages him with apparent fluency, yet seems irritated at the need to communicate in his language. In one telling moment, she accuses him of lying, seemingly because he challenges her behavior. The driver, visibly frustrated, calls her a โcriminalโ for not letting him leave.
Ironically, her tone shifts between condescension and confusion, with some viewers pointing out that her grasp of Spanish may not be as strong as she thinks.
The driver repeatedly gestures to the locked side door, stating he cannot exit through the overhead loading bay because itโs too narrow. Meanwhile, the employee refuses to open the door, instead holding her ground while seemingly waiting for backup.
โHe wants to leave and sheโs stopping him,โ one Reddit user wrote. โThatโs illegal.โ
While thereโs speculation in the comments that other exits may have been available, users were quick to point out that the responsibility to provide a clear and safe exit shouldnโt fall on the driver.
Viewers across Reddit and TikTok were split: some saw a clear-cut case of false imprisonment, while others argued there may have been a breakdown in protocol or a misunderstanding about delivery procedures.
Still, the optics arenโt great for Target. Multiple users questioned the legality of detaining a non-employee for bureaucratic reasons. โShe can complain all she wants,โ one commenter noted. โBut she canโt stop you from leaving. At that point, you could physically force your way out.โ
Others were less diplomatic. โBye bye job,โ one user posted bluntly.
This incident comes as Target continues to face mounting criticism over workplace culture, employee training, and customer interactions. Though the company has not issued a statement at the time of writing, the videoโs virality is likely to pressure corporate to respond.
Whether this becomes a cautionary tale about customer service overreach, or another flashpoint in the ongoing tension between frontline workers and independent contractors, one thing is clear: locking someone inside a store (especially over paperwork) isnโt just bad optics. It might be illegal.
