A viral post on X has highlighted California’s Supplier Diversity Program, under which the state’s Public Utilities Commission encourages major utility companies to direct a portion of contracts to state-certified LGBTQ-owned businesses.
The program, which includes a formal certification process requiring documentation of ownership, targets approximately $633 million in procurement if goals are met. Assistant Attorney General Harmeet Dhillon announced a federal investigation into the initiative in California, sparking significant online discussion.
The accompanying video from Fox News presents statements from Christopher Rufo describing California’s Supplier Diversity Program. In the clip, Rufo outlines how utility companies are encouraged to award contracts to businesses that pass a certification process involving letters from doctors, friends, and LGBT organizations. He states that the program directs around $633 million toward such firms and argues that it limits opportunities for others while prioritizing identity over competence and merit.
According to the post, Assistant Attorney General Harmeet Dhillon is investigating the program. The text claims the state has established an official certification requirement that excludes non-qualifying companies and requires contracts to be awarded solely on qualifications. Background details in related reporting confirm the existence of the CPUC program with procurement goals for certified LGBT-owned businesses. However, the characterization of it as exclusively “gay-only” contracts reflects the perspective presented in the post.
X Users Unleash on Newsom’s “Gay Certification” Contract Push
Some users directed sharp criticism at Governor Newsom, with one writing, “Newsom is a POS!!! This is what he would do if he became president!” and another stating, “The most criminally corrupt Governor in the Country and Democrats want this Criminal to be President.”
Others highlighted the certification process and state priorities. One comment read, “Newsom’s California now requires ‘gay certification’? This is the priority while the state burns, taxes crush everyone, and streets are filthy.” Another said, “Holy *expletive*! This LGBTQ is out of control!! You’re gay! I don’t care. Can you do the job? Giving contracts should be based on how well a company can do the job, not based on color, race, or if you’re gay!!”
Several responses called for contracts to be based strictly on merit and performance. One user noted, “If the allegations are accurate, government contracts should be awarded based on qualifications, value, and performance, not on a person’s sexual orientation, race, or any other protected characteristic. Equal opportunity means everyone gets the same chance to compete under the same rules. The investigation should determine the facts and whether the program complies with the law.”
Additional comments included a religious perspective: “In the name of Jesus Christ, we rebuke all of the Pride, denounce it & decree justice by His mighty hand! Praying for California to be transformed from evil into goodness! So much pain in suffering in that state!”
The dispute has become the latest flashpoint in the broader debate over diversity-based contracting programs and whether they comply with federal law. As supporters and critics continue to clash over the issue, the Department of Justice’s investigation into California’s initiative remains ongoing.
